Comments on: No Reservations N.O.

By: Christy

Christy — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:19:30 +0000

I too thought that the show focused too much on Katrina. Of course they had to mention the elephant in the room, but at the end of the day, I would have rather seen the focus more on the food and the businesses that are open, rather than having Chris Rose cry into his beer.

By: Stuart

Stuart — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:45:04 +0000

Nice review. Very accurate, I think. Just watched it last night (after I had read this, so your comments were in my mind as I watched). It was interesting to watch AB grovel a bit in front of Emeril. Of course, he just HAD to take a swipe at Rachel Ray to make himself feel better… Not that I’m a huge RR fan either…. if I hear E-V-O-O one more time!!
On a different note, nice blog. I’ve been reading it for a bit now.

By: mybayouvieux

mybayouvieux — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:03:39 +0000

I agree with both Nola and Stacey.
I too am tired of the beating of the dead horse. Er. Well, dying horse.
But, it is true. People outside of here think the entire city is still homeless and closed for business.

By: stacey

stacey — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0000

I think a lot of the Katrina related items seem to be focused down here, air down here, they hold benefits down here. Things like that. I think benefits need to be held outside the city because, well um hello! I do think Katrina and NOLA need to stay in the public eye because some people think we are still under water to this day. I am not kidding.

By: Nola

Nola — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:49:46 +0000

I think it is good that NOLA and Katrina remain in the public eye, but I agree with you–for us here we are tired of IT and want to revel in the things that are back or were not effected.

Sounds like a good awareness piece but one that we NOLA-folks may find not so interesting. Too bad.

Like the new banner and tag-line!